Web Deals Cheer Hollywood, Despite Drop in Moviegoers
By Brooks Barnes for The New York Times
Movie attendance hit a 16-year low in 2011. Star wattage continues to dim. DVD sales keep plunging. Almost none of the films being honored at Sunday’s Academy Awards have struck a mainstream nerve.
Yet Hollywood has a noticeable spring in its step. After all, it’s not the music business.
Instead of Hollywood suffering its own Napster moment — the kind of digital death trap that decimated music labels first through the illegal downloading of files and then by a migration to legal downloads almost solely through iTunes — several deals announced this month have it feeling more in control.
While studios still consider piracy a huge problem and feel stymied by Silicon Valley (and Washington politics), they nevertheless control their content. And now the Web is coming to them.
Google is developing a home entertainment device and several media companies have announced plans for new online streaming services. Taken together, the moves mean no supplier will have a monopoly over the distribution of films and television on the Internet. With more buyers comes leverage, and higher prices for content.
“The mood has shifted from, ‘Oh, my God, our business models are broken and we’re going to be cannibalized’ to something resembling euphoria,” said Peter Guber, a former chairman of Columbia Pictures who is now chief executive of the Mandalay Entertainment Group, which has interests in movies, TV and sports. “Studios see a robust, accelerating online market.”
Serious Web-based buyers for movies and television shows are popping up all over. Netflix, the DVD-by-mail and streaming service, was already aggressively pursuing Hollywood content and making sizable payments for it. This month, in a clear challenge to Netflix, Verizon and Redbox said they would team up on a service to stream studio films on the Internet. Days later, Amazon completed a deal to buy episodes of Viacom-owned programs, including “Jersey Shore” and “SpongeBob SquarePants,” as it prepares to introduce a stand-alone streaming service that also will compete with Netflix.
Hollywood also anticipates that YouTube and Google will soon expand their movie and television service beyond rentals to include sales. Steadily ramping up their offerings are Walmart’s Vudu, Best Buy’s CinemaNow, Apple’s iTunes and Hulu. And that is just in North America. The competition for online movie and television rights is also heating up in places like Brazil, where NetMovies Entertainment has a deal to stream material owned by the Walt Disney Company.
The money is not yet big enough to make up for lost DVD revenue, but it is substantial. Barton Crocket, an analyst at Lazard Capital Markets, estimates that Netflix spent $937 million for streaming rights in 2011 and will pay $1.8 billion in 2012, as deals activate for CW shows like “90210” and DreamWorks Animation movies and TV shows.
On Tuesday, Netflix struck a deal for certain films from the Weinstein Company, including “The Artist,” the best picture front-runner at the Oscars. The CW deal, signed last year and estimated to be worth $1 billion in and of itself, runs four years. DreamWorks is getting an estimated $30 million a movie over an unspecified number of years. Last month, Disney agreed to provide streaming content to Comcast as part of a 10-year deal that will bring billions of dollars in revenue to Disney.
Studios worked meticulously to get to this point, holding content back, or at least doling it out very carefully. They made restrictive deals for library material, for instance, and tried to avoid exclusive arrangements that would damp competitive bidding. They also have had bandwidth on their side: the music industry was speedily overtaken by the Web in large part because songs are small enough to trade on limited bandwidth.
“We’re still in the learning process, but it’s looking very exciting,” said Ken Werner, president of domestic distribution at Warner Brothers Television. “The digital marketplace is evolving in a way that is very good for us.”
This is an excerpt. Click here to read the full article in The New York Times.